Showing posts with label SMB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SMB. Show all posts

Sunday, March 10, 2013

The SME mindset - Indians



The Indian community in South Africa are an enigma to many other South Africans. The Indian business community are generally respected as being great traders. However, with time they have proven themselves as able business people in big businesses as much as in small businesses. 

They however are not renowned for sharing their business secrets, even within the Indian community. I have had students doing dissertations think they would get the cooperation of Indian business people because they too were Indians. However, they too were unable to get access to the inner “secrets” of the Indian business community.

While lecturing entrepreneurship, I have always encouraged students to start, build and sell their businesses. A business worth RXm is only worth potential wealth of RXm. It is not wealth. It is only potential wealth!!! No cash.no wealth. My Indian students will just not accept this as an option. Not one. As far as they are concerned, once you have created a successful business, you keep it. I support the “cash is king” system. Start them and sell them is what I believe will produce the greatest wealth. This allows for you to then buy or start a bigger business, and create greater wealth, with reduced dependence on outside funding.

The Indian community tend to prefer family-run businesses and I have not met any with partners, other than in the professions. 

Sunday, July 22, 2012

SMEs - South Africa marking time?

SMEs are once again in the background. Very little new is going on which is new. There is a SME conference in Bloemfontein 26 and 27 July. Contact the Bloemfontein Chamber of Commerce for details.

The conference appears to be different to the run of the mill, so here's hoping it is.

Another finance related conference will take place in November with the KZN Treasury the possible sponsor. This too should be an unusual conference. I will provide more info as time progresses.

New info will be advised as it becomes available.

Sunday, July 1, 2012

SMEs - what SMEs need to do

SMEs are desperately in need of help and protection - from themselves. While it is easy to sit back and criticise government, especially when they make it so easy to do so, but surely we have responsibilities as well.

How many SMEs take advantage of government efforts to assist business?  How many SMEs complain in writing to government about what is wrong? How many SMEs have identified their weaknesses? Do you know what your weaknesses are?

The fact is that every business has these components:
1. Administration
2. Finance
3. Marketing (excluding sales)
4. Sales
5. Technical skills

The first three can all be outsourced to an external party such as an accountant or a consultant. However, the process of selling and technical skills are the two components you cannot outsource. These the owner of the business has to do themselves or employ people to do it. However, especially in a smaller business, this increases the risk of failure if staff resign. Furthermore early stage businesses can sometimes not afford these employees, so the owner has to do them.

But the admin, finance and marketing are also critically important, and outsourcing should be seen as a temporary status. It is imperative that business owners gain at least an understanding of these areas of expertise, such that they can interpret and make decisions upon the information provided by the accountant or consultant. Would you like to drive a car at speed with a blindfold on, and some one telling you when to turn and when to brake. Unlikely that you will enjoy the experience!

So the contribution SMEs can make is to improve their skills, as well as those of their staff. I am always reminded of the story and the CEO who was big on staff training. At a meeting with fellow CEOs in his industry, one of his peers mentioned the fact that they loved the fact that he trained people so well as they helped the industry to find good people. They then asked him why trained when he knew they might leave. His response was that if he did not train them, they might stay. Think about it!!

So in conclusion, the best thing SME owners can do is to realise their limitations and then ensure they reduce these by gaining sufficient knowledge to at least understand things, even if they are unable to do them.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

SMEs - chambers of commerce in South Africa

In respect of SMEs, the chamber of commerce situation in South Africa is interesting. There were four original Chambers of Commerce ion South Africa. South African Chamber of Commerce and Industries (SACCI formerly SACOB),AHI, NAFCOC, and FABCOS. While none of them ever limited membership to any particular race or cultural group, SACCI was always perceived to represent the English white businesses, AHI the Afrikaans white businesses, and NAFCOC and FABCOS black businesses. Today SACCI and AHI actively seek membership from all race groups, while NAFCOC and FABCOS tend to only attract black members. Government attempted to force a merger of these bodies, under the BUSA/CHAMSA umbrella, and failed dismally. BUSA still exists but it has little to no interest in SMEs. The national South African Chamber of Commerce & Industries does nothing for SMEs and they have no interest therein at all. However, their constituent members, the local Chamber of Commerce, are generally comprised of 70+% SMEs. A number of these such as Pietermaritzburg, Durban, Bloemfontein among others do fantastic work for SMEs. However, they have experienced a large decline in membership, I would imagine due to retirement and emigration. They are the local representatives of the IP rights for the name Chamber of Commerce, which is an internationally protected trademark as I recall. The national Afrikaanse Handels Instituut is very small, and generally their members are also members of the local Chamber of Commerce, and tend to be more of a cultural organisation for Afrikaans business people.Their membership numbers are very small, and they have much fewer members than the Chamber of Commerce's. Another Chamber of Commerce is Minara, which targets Muslim businesses, and was only established in 2000. Then there is a plethora of new chambers of all of whom claim membership in the thousands. It is not clear what real value they add, and whether they really do have the membership numbers they claim to have. Time will tell whether or not they are money making scams for the organisers. However, the membership will make that decision for themselves based upon a sense of value received. The established chambers of commerce are only interested in big businesses, and there are a number of reasons why this is so. However, the new chambers have little if any interest in matters related to representing SMEs and SME issues to government. There one or two who claim to be acting on behalf of SMEs and attempting to engage with government, but based upon the extremely vitriolic comments from some of them, they are more likely destroy SME relationships with government than build them. All these Chambers combined have at most a combined membership of SMEs in the region of 60 000 to 70 000. However, consensus indicates that there are at least 1.5m to 2.5m SMEs in South Africa. This tells it's own story. Does the SME community need a decent representative body to represent their interests in respect of the private and public sector? Absolutely! Is it available now? No! Will it happen in the near future? Unlikely! Why not? Because as with all things in South Africa everything is segmented into narrow interest groups. There is no need for religious, racial, cultural, sectoral segments within the SME group. There is only place for a single SME group.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

SMEs - are government hindering or helping?

SMEs in South Africa will find that they are in a bitter sweet situation here in South Africa. Against government: 1. Rabid unions 2. SME insensitive bargaining councils 3. Poor government marketing of what they really do offer SMEs 4. Poor payment 5. Regulatory overload and red tape 6. Rigid labour markets 7. Slow decision making and implementation 8. An inactive Presidential SME Council that fails because of political appointees 9. BEE legislation that helps no one. 10. Too much stick and not enough carrot. Make the Nats look open minded. For government 1. Massive amounts of capital 2. Numerous interventions to assist SMEs 3. A desire to help The problem is that on balance I believe the overall impact is negative, but could easily be swung around if there was a political will to do so. If SMEs are so important, who is more valuable to the government? SMEs or the unions? I believe the SMEs are.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

How many SMEs?

Everyone would like to know exactly how many SMEs there are. Do you include micro enterprises in this question? In South Africa the numbers bandied about vary from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000. There is no definitive answer however. The Cipro data is badly skewed due to political interference, with numerous dormant cooperatives, closed corporations and companies. No one knows how many sole proprietorships exist in the formal sector, and even less idea of informal sector "businesses". Many cities and towns have discontinued licencing of businesses, and so no one can do a census. From a research and economic development perspective it is a nightmare. The only realistic assessment of the number of economically active businesses possibly lies at SARS, the tax man for the uninitiated. However, they have steadfastly refused to divulge this information or provide access to researchers. So much for transparent democracy, which obviously contributes to the general failure to create jobs. Researchers cannot design interventions without an insight, which we cannot get. However, there a host of other reasons that contribute to the lack of information, such as the large number of state employees with sideline businesses.

Botswana were very organised with a database of just over 13000 businesses classed as SMEs. If you assume, without any real research or statistical validity, that Botswana, Namibia and Lesotho have similar population numbers, and Swaziland approximately half that number, a fair estimate for all these countries would be 45000 SMEs. Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe all have bigger populations but do not necessarily have economies that are as developed, and i would therefore hesitate to make a guess for these countries. If you assume they have double the number of businesses you would estimate 135,000 in total for the countries surrounding South Africa. But this is guesswork and not research.

However, it does help to contextualise South Africa with business numbers in the millions compared to 135,000 to say 250,000, with approximately equivalent populations of say 50 million people.

I hope this answers the reader question in this regard. However, further input would be welcome in refining this response.
I do have exact data on some countries which is available commercially.
Rob

Monday, January 3, 2011

SMEs – SMEs struggling in South Africa. Why?

Many white-owned businesses have struggled since 1994. Many new businesses owned by all races since 1994, have found it difficult to establish themselves and grow.

Obviously the pre-1994 white-owned businesses allocate blame to the change of government. While this is a logical conclusion to draw, how accurate is it? There is no doubt that this had an impact on those businesses who had previously been a supplier to government, as government made an attempt to make their purchases reflect the country’s demographics.

However, what many of these business people have forgotten is that soon after 1994 South Africa rejoined the WTO. Furthermore, many businesses that had previously not been trading in South Africa due to anti-Apartheid trade restrictions, suddenly appeared at the front door to trade in South Africa and to use South Africa as a stepping stone into the rest of Africa.

Yes, globalisation had arrived! The problem is that very few South African SME business people have realised this. They still think they can continue to run businesses suited to lifestyle entrepreneurs without changing their businesses. They are still trying to understand why their profit margins have dropped and remain low. This is purely about globalisation. Thanks Walmart. While consumers may be happy with lower profit margins, SMEs are not. Low margins demand much higher volumes to stay in business.

The questions that this raises are whether these SMEs have increased sales volumes, have they tried to bypass the volume solution by becoming niche players in order to reduce the impact of the high volume/low price competitors? While my comments are based on anecdotal research, it appears to me that not many have changed how they do business. They all seem to be focused on the good old days instead of the future.

SMEs need to accept that they need to carve out a niche for themselves or scale up. The problem is that South Africa offers an incredible lifestyle opportunity, and this can distract attention away from the important issues. The problem is that our new SME owners have arrived bearing similar attitudes and expectations, and are wondering why they cannot make it. We all need to change our thinking going forward, because whether we like it or not we are part of the global village.

Friday, December 31, 2010

SMEs - SMEs and labour market rigidity

Left wing governments often resort to protection of their labour forces. This is generally necessitated by political rather than economic imperatives. This leads to rigidity in the labour markets and has a number of negative consequences.

SMEs are generally unable to pay top prices for their staff members, and by default feed from the bottom of the labour barrel. They cannot offer perks such as pensions, medical etc. Therefore when it becomes too difficult to acquire, retrench or fire staff, they simply keep it tight. They try and reduce staff before the new legislation comes in. They tailor everything to existing revenue streams. They simply do not have any of the assets necessary to handle the situation. They do not have money for legal employees, or legal advice. They cannot pay minimum salaries.

Rigid labour markets have a negative impact on economic and job growth. SMEs are equally affected by this situation. As they close ranks in order to reduce staff, so they reduce their ability to grow their businesses. Everyone is a loser, including SMEs.

South Africa has been particularly heavy handed in this regard and are about to add even more to this hamfisted approach to economic development. The new round of labour legislation is a potential nightmare for SMEs and large businesses.

SME - types of opportunities

The starting point for me with writing this document was Prof Mark Casson from the University of Reading on the UK.

As an economist he wanted to know how many opportunities there were and who decided who got which opportunities.

I did a little desktop research as I found the question intriguing. My research revealed the following. Opportunities vary in complexity. Therefore the skills, knowledge and experience needed to sell fruit to people at a taxi rank in a developing country is minimal. However, at the other end of the scale, identifying two companies for a merger, and then succeeding in achieving a merger between the two, requires a high level of skills, knowledge and experience.

So the first thing to note is that opportunities can be graded from extremely simple through to extremely complex. Similarly, the simpler the opportunity, the more of them there are, and the converse is also true for complex opportunities.

The second thing to note is that as complexity increases so too does the profitability in respect of both % and actual value. While you may be selling oranges at the taxi rank for US $1, the merger could be a US $10bn deal.

Therefore the question must be asked as to whether you are looking for simplicity or complexity when looking for a new business opportunity?

Bear in mind that your ability to handle complexity will be informed by your education and experience.

How complex is your business or your new idea? Here in South Africa there are too many copy cat entrepreneurs. They are lifestyle entrepreneurs simply looking for an easy buck. I have seen very very few business plans that have made me sit up and say wow. However, we can do it, and this is evident when we look at the number of world leading products designed in South Africa.

SME - types of entrepreneur

Research indicates a number of different types of entrepreneur. These include survivalist entrepreneur; salary replacement entrepreneur; lifestyle entrepreneur, small business manager, franchisee, copycat entrepreneur, franchisor, inventrepreneurs, serial entrepreneur, portfolio entrepreneur, angel funder and venture capitalist.

However these can be grouped into three (3) groups of people who act in a similar manner.

The first is the survivalist. The survivalist is often associated with informal sector survivalist businesses, but could also include the formal sector person forced through circumstances into self employment. This could be someone who has been retrenched.

The second group is the lifestyle entrepreneur. They vary in a number of ways, but generally are the same “animal”. For some the “lifestyle” is about working the hours they want, or the type of business (maybe a hobby) or about maintaining a lifestyle which includes holidays, and toys such as motorbikes, cars, caravans, boats etc. All of them have clearly defined “rules” on how they run their business. These rules are written in stone most of the time. Do not ask these entrepreneurs to work late or weekends.

The third group are the high growth entrepreneurs. These are the entrepreneurs who generate large profits quickly, normally create the bulk of new jobs in an economy, and are able to retire young. Notice I said “able to”; many do not and start the next business soon after they harvest from their business.

Where do you fit in?

The South African government has not recognised this current research, and consequently are not fine tuning their SME development strategies accordingly. This is a pity, as the job creation we so desperately need in South Africa is not being achieved as a result. It is time governments all over the world start consulting with SME specialists in order to understand the research findings in this area of expertise. This will assist in creating better SME development interventions.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

SMEs in South Africa - why is finance difficult to access

SMEs in South Africa do struggle to raise start-up finance from banks. The question is why?

There has been little, if any, in-depth research into why banks are not lining up to lend to this large, risky, yet very profitable market.

I myself am hoping to research the following suggestion in order to see if it has any validity. The suggestion is that a major contributory factor is that SME and entrepreneur are being interchangably used in South Africa.

There is a continuum of entrepreneurial endeavour suggested by Burch, and I believe that the SME owner is not synonymous with being an entrepreneur. Some SME owners may well be entrepreneurial, but it is not a given.

Consequently, banks have no tools with which to assess these SME owners, which makes the loaning of finance to them extremely difficult.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

SMEs in South Africa - is tendering good for SMEs

How important is government business and large business for SMEs?

I believe it is very important, but there are riders here which must be considered. The purpose of government allocating business to SMEs, is to try and grow the SME sector, as growing SMEs are key players in job creation.

But how can these SMEs keep growing unless they receive continuous business. Sustainable SME creation and growth is completely dependent on continuous business from the buying organisation. But government and large businesses are strong believers that tendering is the best means to purchase the products and services they need. They feel the need to remain impartial in the purchasing process. Yet they espouse supply chain management as their credo. Supply chain management expressly guides the buyer to choosing suppliers that enhance the efficiencies of the buyer at every level. So surely tendering is in contradiction of this credo.

Is tendering an anachronism from the past? Is it not time for government and large businesses to treat the purchasing function in the true spirit of supply chain management, and stop resorting to tendering practices that “are objective” when in fact subjectivity is exactly what is needed.

If government policies are to achieve the goal of creating and growing SMEs, and large businesses are to find the efficiencies they desperately seek in their supply chain, through the use of SMEs, then we need to return to subjective purchasing practices.

Government and big business are equally as guilty in the South African context. I have heard senior people openly admit to simply keep changing supplier in order to supply orders to anyone who applies to be a supplier. This is counter-productive and in my mind counter-intuitive.

Let us create sustainable SMEs not one-order wonders!

SMEs in South Africa - the end of Closed Corporations

The Companies Act is about to undergo a major review. This has a number of good aspects and as with everything else in life a number of bad. The questions is whether or not you have a clue about this Act and how it will impact on you?

Too many businesses simply allow the government to do what they like, without providing feedback, whether positive or negative. It is imperative that you read the legislation and decide for yourself what the impact will be on your business.

So go to the following website link and review the Act. http://www.michalsons.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/companies_act_71_2008.pdf

Understand the impact.


If you have any problems with the Act then let us know on rob@smorfitt.co.za and we can forward your input to the government.

Sunday, June 7, 2009

SMEs in South Africa - the African opportunities

As suggested in my blog 2 weeks ago, the African markets present a big opportunity for South Africa.

I saw some data which says despite the recession, Africa should still achieve 6+% GDP growth this year, albeit that it is off a low base. South African trade data show an increase in South African / Africa trade already, as well as the expected decline with USA and Europe.

The big corporates are already trying to penetrate these markets, but SMEs can do so as well.

There are a number of Africa oriented business magazines around. Have a look and get yourself informed. I purchased "African Business" and found a lot of useful information.